Thursday, November 23, 2006

How Hannibal got his Groove


One of the most popular fictionalized protrayals of criminal profiling was presented to the public in the form of FBI agent Clarice Starling in the Thomas Harris novel 'The Silence of the Lambs", which was made into perhaps one of the scariest films ever.

"It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again")

Clarice was great, but the public was so fascinated by the character of Dr. Hannibal Lecter that it led to a couple of sequels and now the inevitable prequel, Hannibal Rising.

The novel, by Harris, will be available on December 5th and the movie of the same name is set to be released in February. You can read or hear an excerpt from the novel at the Thomas Harris website.

Tuesday, November 21, 2006

A Trace of Irony?

A few helpful links for your research and analysis following today's lab on Locard's Exchange Principle:
"Edmond Locard (1877-1966) was the founder and director of the Institute of criminalistics at the University of Lyons in France. He believed that whenever a criminal came into contact with his environment, a cross-transference of evidence occurred. He believed that "every criminal can be connected to a crime by dust particles carried from the scene." (Saferstein, Richard, Criminalistics, Seventh Ed., 2001)"

Monday, November 20, 2006

Katrina's Legal Legacy: Evidence Washed away.

The NY Times today reported on what we knew was coming: as many as 500 defendants, mostly in drug, theft and assault cases, have been freed because of problems with evidence (as much as 90% of pending case evidence, it seems, had been stored in paper containers), including difficulty in finding the witnesses who have moved away, a shortage of jurors, possibly ruined DNA samples and other factors.

Saturday, November 18, 2006

IF(!?!) OJ did it

Newsflash: He aint gonna get the chance to tell us.

"
The good news for him is that now he will have plenty of time on his hands to do what he said he was going to do years ago: spend all his energy and resources seeking out the real killer. "

Not Guilty!Years after the "Trial of the Century", OJ Simpson has come clean. Happy Holidays from OJ

Sort of.

In a new book and upcoming TV Interview by "If I did it" Publisher Judith Regan (set to air Nov 27 & 29on Fox, the model of tasteful, quality programming), The Juice tells us exactly how he did it, if he had done it, which he says he didn't.

Uh-huh.

Since Simpson was aquitted of the murder (though found responsible in the civil case), he cannot be tried on the murder charge in the state of California. We're hoping that a Federal prosecutor out there is watching, and perhaps he can be prosecuted in the same manner as the murderers of Civil Rights workers were prosecuted years after the events on Federal Civil Rights charges.

Would it surpise you to know that this is actually OJ's SECOND book about the crime? In February of 1995, in the middle of his trial, OJ published "I Want to Tell You". An Amazon.com review of the book puts it best:
"The killer tells us about his glory days as a football player and his "wonderful" life with poor Nicole, conveniently omitting his no contest plea to spousal abuse and eschewing references to the 8 times Nicole called the police to settle their domestic disputes. But the most glaring omission in this trashy, exploitive book is a confession"
and now we have that part too.

Helpful links:

  • OJTrial.com
  • Famous Trials: OJ Simpson
  • Wikipedia entry on the trial
  • Court TV
  • Goldman wants to own OJ's face
  • Celebrity Mugshots
  • OJ Find Real Killer (theOnion.com)
  • The OJ Trial if written by Suess
  • Blood! So Much BLOOD!

    A couple of helpful links for blood evidence analysis:

    Murder by the Book

    Following up on our viewing of the James Ellroy episode in class, the Murder by the Book Series on Court TV continues over the next few weeks with:

  • Michael Connelly
  • Jonathan Kellerman
  • Faye Kellerman
  • Lisa Scottoline
  • In case you missed it, here's the class assignment:

    (1) Write a short summary of the Elizabeth Short Case (see the Black Dahlia entry on this blog)
    (2) Compare the Short murder to that of Geneva Helliker Ellroy in terms of forensics
    (3) Based on the various aspects of modern forensics we have studied and discussed in class, do you think the Ellroy murder case could be solved it it were committed today? Why or why not? What modern techniques and resources would help the investigation?